The Shift From Using the Model to Trusting the Conversation

The Shift From Using the Model to Trusting the Conversation

 

When people begin learning to coach, models can feel enormously reassuring.

They offer structure to something that might otherwise feel unfamiliar and unpredictable. They help us understand the shape of a coaching conversation, give us a sense of where we are and suggest useful ways of moving forwards. For a new coach, this matters because the work can initially feel quite exposing. You’re sitting with another person, discussing something meaningful and important to them, and there is no script telling you exactly what to say next. 

A model gives you something to hold onto. It can reassure you that there is a process, that you’re not simply making it up as you go along, that you’re providing value, and that even if the conversation becomes difficult or uncertain, you have a framework to return to. For someone who is still developing confidence, this can create a valuable sense of stability.

Models can be an important part of learning the craft. The challenge comes when the model stops supporting the conversation and starts organising it too tightly. What was once a source of confidence can become something the coach feels dependent on, particularly if they’ve not yet developed enough confidence and trust in their own listening and presence. At that point, the coaching can begin to feel more mechanical than responsive.

 

Why models can become a safety net

Part of the reason models are so appealing is that they reduce uncertainty.

New coaches are trying to hold a great deal at once. They’re learning how to listen more deeply, how to ask questions without leading, how to maintain appropriate boundaries, how to contract well and how to avoid slipping too quickly into advice or problem-solving. 

Alongside all of that, they are often monitoring themselves quite closely. Am I doing this properly? Is this still coaching? Have I missed something? Should I be using a different technique? What do I do if the client does not know the answer? A model can quieten some of that internal noise because it offers a route through the session. It can give the coach a sense that there is a logical next step.

This is especially useful early on because uncertainty can easily be mistaken for incompetence. If a conversation takes an unexpected turn, the coach may feel as though they’ve lost control of the session. If there’s a long pause, they may begin searching for a question simply because silence feels like an absence of coaching. In those moments, a familiar framework can provide comfort.

But there’s a difference between using a model as support and relying on it to remove uncertainty altogether. Coaching, particularly transformative coaching, is inherently uncertain. We can’t know in advance what will become significant for the client, and no framework can fully predict the direction an inquiry will take. Part of developing as a coach is gradually becoming more comfortable with that.

 

When the model starts to lead the session

The difficulty with over-reliance on models is that they can change the way we listen. Instead of hearing the client openly, we start listening for the material the model requires.

If the next step in the model is about goals, we listen for the goal. If the framework tells us to explore options, we begin looking for possibilities. If we know the session should end with an action, we may start steering towards something concrete before the client is ready.

A client may say something that seems tangential to the original issue but carries real significance. They may question the goal they arrived with, reveal a tension they hadn’t recognised, or realise that the practical problem they wanted to solve is connected to something deeper about identity, values or relationships.

If we’re too committed to completing the framework, those moments can easily be treated as distractions rather than openings. For the client, this can feel constraining. They may sense that they’re being taken somewhere, even if the questions themselves are open.  When models are held too tightly, the session can become about completing the coach’s process rather than understanding a person.

 

Holding structure more lightly

As confidence develops, the coach’s relationship with models can begin to change. The framework doesn’t disappear, but it moves into the background. Instead of asking, “What comes next in the model?”, the coach becomes more interested in, “What is happening here, and what seems to matter now?”

The direction no longer comes primarily from the model, it comes from the interaction between the client’s experience, the focus of the session and what is emerging in the conversation. If a client needs more time with an emotion, there is less pressure to move on. If the original goal becomes less relevant, it can be reconsidered. If a question opens something unexpected, the coach can follow it without worrying that the session has gone off track. For the client, this often creates a different experience of coaching. 

Holding models lightly also changes the coach’s internal experience. Instead of thinking about what stage we’re at, we can pay closer attention to what the client has just said. Instead of preparing the next question, we can notice the pause, contradiction or shift in tone that might otherwise have passed us by.

 

Models can still be valuable

There is sometimes a temptation to see models as something beginners use, and seasoned practitioners grow out of. But frameworks and models are still useful. They can help structure for the session, and to ensure that the conversation is purposeful and meaningful for the client.

For an experienced coach, this structure is more likely to happen naturally as part of the way they coach, rather than intentionally following a model.

The question we can ask ourselves is whether the way we are working is serving the client. Sometimes that means introducing more structure, sometimes it means loosening it. The skill lies in knowing the difference.

 

Trusting the conversation without losing the craft

The developmental shift isn’t about moving from strict structure to having no structure at all. When the coach becomes less reliant on the model they can become more present and more responsive, able to dance with the client in the moment. The client gains more room to think and explore more organically.

When that happens, coaching changes from working through a process to trusting the conversation.

 

Author Details
Ruth Randall is the CEO of Animas Centre for Coaching. Ruth trained as a transformative coach with Animas in 2015, and also works as a mentor coach and coaching supervisor.
Ruth New Profile
Ruth Randall

Ruth Randall is the CEO of Animas Centre for Coaching. Ruth trained as a transformative coach with Animas in 2015, and also works as a mentor coach and coaching supervisor.

Interested in Becoming a Coach?

Here are 2 Great Ways to Find Out More

Book a spot at our FREE Introduction to Transformative Coaching

Join a live training session delivered in small groups via Zoom.

Download The Complete Guide to Becoming a Coach

Get this comprehensive book and coaching and the journey to train as a coach.

Latest Blog Posts

The 12 Principles of Transformative Coaching: Embracing the Complexity of Being Human in the 21st Century

Discover the 12 core principles that underpin transformative coaching at Animas.

The Collaborative Principle in Transformative Coaching

Transformative coaching is a partnership, that’s co-created with the client. In this article we explore the Collaborative Principle in Transformative Coaching.

When Do Coaching Credentials Become Part of Your Journey?

Your credentialing plan doesn’t need to be mapped out from day one. This article explores when credentials might become relevant, and how they support continued growth.

As AI Learns the Language of Coaching, What Remains Human?

As AI learns to imitate coaching language, this article explores what remains distinctly human in relational, ethical and transformative coaching practice.

The Humanistic Principle in Transformative Coaching

What do we really mean by unconditional positive regard? This article considers the humanistic principle in transformative coaching.

Designing a Coaching Pathway as an HR Professional

Many HR professionals integrate coaching into their existing work before deciding how it might shape the next stage of their career.